Buffalo is slowly losing its trees

The city is cutting down trees at twice the rate it's planting them, and in portions of the East Side, the ratio is 4 to 1. Health can suffer with a loss of tree coverage.

Buffalo is cutting down twice as many trees as it’s planting. And residents are noticing the loss.

“It’s nothing like when I was a child,” said Catherine Faust, a Highland Avenue resident in the city’s Elmwood Village. 

From 2016 through 2020, the city cut down more than 4,300 trees. They only planted about 1,900 new ones. 

An Investigative Post analysis found the rate of tree loss is greater in parts of the East Side. Masten District, for example, lost four times as many trees as were planted.

“It is one of the most despicable things that I can imagine because of the relationship of a green infrastructure, especially a tree canopy, to health outcomes,” said Dr. Henry Taylor, director of the Center for Urban Studies at the University at Buffalo.

“The trees aren’t there just to be beautiful, they’re there to help cleanse and purify the air. They’re there to help create an environment where they absorb groundwater and these other things.”

City officials told Investigative Post nothing in their policy is to blame. 

Arborists and tree-planting organizations said there are challenges in planting trees on the East Side, especially when it comes to aftercare and maintenance. 

“It’s always difficult to plant in the East Side, unfortunately, because if you put in a tree it’s going to die, because there’s maybe not even a house on that property,” said Paul Maurer, chairman of Re-Tree WNY, a nonprofit organization that works with the city to plant trees. “It’s hard to expect a lot of help in that area.” 


Donate to support our nonprofit newsroom


Communities with fewer trees often experience higher rates of asthma and other respiratory diseases, as well as more cardiovascular and psychological disorders. This inequity is a problem many cities across the country are facing, said Ian Leahy, vice president of urban forestry at American Forests, a national nonprofit researching tree equity in cities. 

“We’re in this situation of this big tree equity gap,” Leahy said. “And it’s going to take an investment at the local level to fix.” 

The city has budgeted nearly $1 million for tree-related operations this year, mostly to cover personnel and contractors. Another million in bonds have been sold this year to cover the purchase and planting of trees, among other expenses. While the city is spending about one-third more than it was a decade ago, some residents, like Faust, feel it should be investing more.

Experts and local advocates offer a lot of solutions. Re-Tree Western New York, for example, said they’d help water and maintain trees on the East Side, if they could raise the necessary funding.

“We just don’t have the money for it,” Maurer said.

Impact of Dutch Elm disease

Part of the problem is a decision made by city officials over half a century ago. 

Elm trees lined many of Buffalo’s streets throughout the early and mid 1900s. Then Dutch elm disease struck in the 1950s and 1960s. The fungus killed more than 10,000 elm trees over two decades. 

“When I was a child, our street had the arch of elm trees,” Faust said. “I remember the big trucks coming down the street with these giant hoses spraying the underside of the elms.” 


Crews spray trees to treat Dutch Elm Disease in 1955. Photo courtesy of the Buffalo History Museum.


After the ruin, city officials chose to replace much of the lost canopy with Norwegian and silver maples, as well as linden trees. Those species were relatively inexpensive and fast-growing — seemingly good options.

Now, city officials tell Investigative Post those trees are reaching the end of their lifespan. Their roots are damaging sidewalks and residential property and their trunks and branches are rotting from the inside out. 

They’re getting cut down as a result.

Thirty-one percent of all trees removed between 2016 and 2020 were either Norwegian maples, silver maples or linden trees. Norwegian maples alone accounted for 15 percent of all trees lost in that period.

“They were the wrong choice,” Maurer said. “These are deadly trees, too, because they become brittle when they die or when there’s heavy snow on them. So they cause a lot of problems. And they’ve heaved up the sidewalk, they’ve heaved up the curbs.”


Stumps are all what remains after trees removed in the early 1950s due to Dutch Elm Disease. 
Photo courtesy of the Buffalo History Museum.


Faust, who saw the elms die, is now witnessing the demise of the Norway maples that line her street.

“A lot of dieback,” she said.

Another longtime resident of the street, Anne Sessions, has been watching, too.

“When they finally do cut them down, you know, they’re almost nothing in the middle,” Sessions said. “A friend of mine had one fall on her car on Lexington Avenue. You get a big wind and you get limbs coming down in people’s yards.”

Tree damage is especially a problem during winter storms. In 2006, an early winter storm claimed more than 11,000 city trees. Others, still standing, continue to show the scars.

“We lost a lot of trees due to that October storm that had long-term impacts on trees,” said one city official, who spoke to Investigative Post on background. “Maples don’t always recover from wounds as easily as some other species.”

Nearly 10 percent of the trees cut down between 2016 and 2020 were ash. They are at risk of infestation by emerald ash borers, an invasive insect that feeds on the tissue under a tree’s bark, often killing it within just a few years. 

The city is planting a variety of new trees these days. Of the 1,893 trees planted since 2016, 16.5 percent were species of crabapple, 11.7 percent were a variety of elm, 9.6 percent were London planetrees and 9 percent were species of oak.

Arborists told Investigative Post it can cost anywhere from $150 to $500 to plant a new tree. Removing a tree, on the other hand, can cost $1,000 or more, depending on the size and state of the tree.

Impact on the East Side

Some areas of the city have suffered greater tree losses than others.

Buffalo has lost about 2 percent of its urban forest since 2016: 1,893 trees have been planted and 4,348 removed, resulting in a net loss of 2,455 trees. 

An Investigative Post analysis found overall tree loss was greatest in areas of the East Side. Masten and Fillmore districts lost the most.

In Masten, four trees were removed for every one planted, resulting in an overall loss of 375 trees. In Fillmore, the rate of removals to plantings was three to one, with an overall loss of 355 trees.

Eighty-eight percent of Masten residents are people of color. Thirty-six percent live below the poverty line. The poverty rate is even higher in Fillmore, at 41 percent, where 60 percent of residents identify as minorities.

North and Niagara districts lost the fewest trees, averaging close to the citywide rate of two trees removed for every one tree planted.


Tree loss by Council district in 2016-20

District Removed Planted Net loss
Masten 494 119 375
Fillmore 537 182 355
University 649 320 329
South 445 130 315
Delaware 543 297 246
Ellicott 641 397 244
Lovejoy 318 74 244
Niagara 389 210 188
North 332 173 159
Source: Buffalo Department of Public Works

“If you go on Google map, the satellite view, then you take a look at the East and the West sides, you can visually see the difference between the two places,” said Taylor, of U.B.

The criteria for removal: A tree must be dead, dying, or infested, or pose an immediate hazard. Trees can also be removed to make way for development. City officials maintain their policies do not discriminate against any neighborhoods.

“We don’t look at where a tree is in determining whether or not it needs to be removed,” the city official said. 

Plantings can be requested by residents through the city’s 311 Call Center. 

“The wait is about a year for us to get the tree for free,” the official said.


Total number of trees by Council district in 2020

District Trees
Delaware 20,793
Ellicott 16,755
South 16,734
Masten 16,113
Fillmore 15,500
North 12,831
Lovejoy 12,053
University 11,937
Niagara 11,396
Source: Buffalo Department of Public Works

“It’s always difficult to plant in the East Side,” said Maurer, with Re-Tree WNY.

New trees require aftercare, which is often left up to residents. And research shows residents often don’t want new trees planted until trees already in the ground are properly maintained.

“Very few people actually oppose having trees around, but what they oppose was the lack of maintenance,” said Leahy, with American Forests.

Taylor said that’s true of many East Side residents.

“It’s not just planting a tree, but it’s maintaining it, the pruning, all of the other elements that are involved,” he said. “You don’t find a groundswell of people walking around, ‘We want oak trees, we want one,’ because they don’t. Because they’re afraid that they’ll never be maintained, and the trees will be all out of control.”

Trees promote health

Tree coverage is not just a matter of aesthetics; it also has health implications, especially on the East Side. 

“You’re talking about a section of a Buffalo that’s dissected by all these major thoroughfares, which means that on a daily basis there are thousands of cars and trucks and buses moving through the East Side spewing all kinds of pollution in the air,” Taylor said. 

“What we find are much higher rates of asthma. Much, much higher rates of chronic respiratory disease among African Americans. And other issues that a strong [tree] coverage could help to mitigate.”

The problem is twofold, according to Leahy, of American Forests. 

“As cities are now heating up, it’s becoming more of a life-and-death infrastructure, you know, even in Buffalo, where you’re going to have extreme heat,” he said.

Research shows there are currently about 12,000 heat-related deaths nationwide each year. 


Tree coverage as tracked by American Forests. The darker the orange, the less coverage; the deeper the green, the most coverage.


A second issue, according to Taylor, is that the East Side has long suffered from disinvestment.

“The green infrastructure on the East Side is extraordinarily weak,” he said. 

Taylor said this is an issue the city should be able to address.

“Green infrastructure. That’s not complicated,” Taylor said. “You put trees, you plant shrubbery, you maintain them. You create stormwater gardens. I mean, there’s all kinds of things that you can do.”

Range of solutions

One solution is more funding — to increase plantings, improve infrastructure and provide aftercare and maintenance for new trees.  

 “A lot of it is just budget,” Leahy said. “But you know, a lot of cities, usually post-industrial, just don’t have the resources.”

Buffalo’s Bureau of Forestry has been gradually growing over the past decade. The city allocated $916,831 in last year’s budget to cover the cost of personnel — a forester and three workers — and contracts for tree trimming, inspection and inventory updates. The city also sells bonds to pay for tree removals and planting contracts. The last bond sale was worth $918,000. 

That’s about one-third more than the city spent a decade ago. Some residents think the city should be investing more.

“The thing that I worry about is that the city forestry department is constantly underfunded,” said Faust, the Highland Avenue resident.  

Our Weekly Newsletter

Other cities have worked to reduce inequities by adopting policies and/or  partnering with community organizations. Seattle and Washington, D.C., for example, have started planting several smaller trees to replace large trees, rather than replanting one-for-one.

“If you move a tree with a 10-caliper-inch trunk, which is the diameter across the trunk, then you have to plant, say, five two-inch trees within the vicinity,” Leahy said. “That’s a good way to at least keep your overall canopy from declining.” 

Others use community partnerships.

“Cities are often very, very restricted on what they can do,” Leahy said. “So the most successful ones are a collaborative relationship between a robust nonprofit and the city.”

But at $150 to $500 a tree, reforesting a city doesn’t come cheap.

Maurer said Re-Tree New York, which has planted more than 60,000 trees in the region since the October storm of 2006, wants to do more plantings in the city and help in their aftercare and maintenance by creating a dedicated watering group.

“We’d love to do more in the inner city,” Maurer said. “We could go out in the summer months, keep those trees watered until they go dormant in October. And then we’ll come back again in the spring for a couple of years, and all those new trees will be thriving.”

“That’s a luxury we just can’t, at this point, afford.”


Phil Gambini contributed to this story.